Learning to suck eggs, or is there a case for a postgraduate development studies benchmark?
Copestake, J., 2002. Learning to suck eggs, or is there a case for a postgraduate development studies benchmark? Public Administration and Development, 22 (4), pp. 303-308.
Related documents:This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below.
Many academic disciplines in the UK have recently introduced subject benchmarks that specify core or minimum content for particular degrees. The article suggests that efficiency, quality, and transparency arguments in favour of such benchmarks may be undermined by problems in specification, identification, and implementation. By contrasting the programme specification for the Master's in development studies at Bath (overspecified) with the benchmark for Master's in management and business administration (underspecified), it suggests that an intermediate benchmark for development studies could usefully enhance transparency about what development studies is and what it has to offer. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
|Departments||Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Social & Policy Sciences|
|Research Centres||Centre for Development Studies|
|Additional Information||ID number: ISI:000178960300002|
Actions (login required)