The distinctiveness principle:identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity
Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X. and Breakwell, G. M., 2000. The distinctiveness principle:identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4 (4), pp. 337-354.
Related documents:This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below.
Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.
|Creators||Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X. and Breakwell, G. M.|
|Departments||Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Social & Policy Sciences|
University Administration & Central Services > Vice-Chancellor's Office
Actions (login required)