A comparison of two distributed large-volume measurement systems: the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system and the indoor global positioning system
Maisano, D. A., Jamshidi, J., Franceschini, F., Maropoulos, P. G., Mastrogiacomo, L., Mileham, A. R. and Owen, G. W., 2009. A comparison of two distributed large-volume measurement systems: the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system and the indoor global positioning system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223 (5), pp. 511-521.
Related documents:This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)
Advances in the area of industrial metrology have generated new technologies that are capable of measuring components with complex geometry and large dimensions. However, no standard or best-practice guides are available for the majority of such systems. Therefore, these new systems require appropriate testing and verification in order for the users to understand their full potential prior to their deployment in a real manufacturing environment. This is a crucial stage, especially when more than one system can be used for a specific measurement task. In this paper, two relatively new large-volume measurement systems, the mobile spatial co-ordinate measuring system (MScMS) and the indoor global positioning system (iGPS), are reviewed. These two systems utilize different technologies: the MScMS is based on ultrasound and radiofrequency signal transmission and the iGPS uses laser technology. Both systems have components with small dimensions that are distributed around the measuring area to form a network of sensors allowing rapid dimensional measurements to be performed in relation to large-size objects, with typical dimensions of several decametres. The portability, reconfigurability, and ease of installation make these systems attractive for many industries that manufacture large-scale products. In this paper, the major technical aspects of the two systems are briefly described and compared. Initial results of the tests performed to establish the repeatability and reproducibility of these systems are also presented.
|Creators||Maisano, D. A., Jamshidi, J., Franceschini, F., Maropoulos, P. G., Mastrogiacomo, L., Mileham, A. R. and Owen, G. W.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords||large-scale metrology,distance measurements,dimensional measurement,metrological performance,indoor gps,mobile measuring system|
|Departments||Faculty of Engineering & Design > Mechanical Engineering|
|Research Centres||Innovative Design & Manufacturing Research Centre (IdMRC)|
|Additional Information||Proceedings paper from the 4th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology. University of Bath, Bath, England, 19-21 September, 2007|
Actions (login required)