Research

Effects of Personal Carbon Allowances on decision making: Evidence from an experimental simulation


Reference:

Capstick, S. and Lewis, A., 2010. Effects of Personal Carbon Allowances on decision making: Evidence from an experimental simulation. Climate Policy, 10 (4), pp. 369-384.

Related documents:

This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)

Official URL:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0034

Abstract

Behavioural influences of personal carbon trading (PCT) beyond those anticipated by pure price effects have been a theoretically attractive, yet empirically elusive, feature of such schemes. Computer-based simulation is used to examine the effects of participants' decisions on their personal carbon allocations within a PCT context. Evidence is presented about participants' tendencies to make more energy-conserving decisions as a consequence of attending to a restrictive and diminishing carbon allowance - independent of other financial and carbon cost information provided suggesting that a form of 'carbon budgeting' is occurring. Further measurements indicate that the extent of carbon reduction achieved within the simulated PCT framework varies according to pro-environmental attitudes. Evidence is also presented that the size of participants' footprints correlates inversely with support for PCT; and that pro-environmental attitudes correlate positively with support for PCT. The advantages and drawbacks of using simulations for examining behavioural responses to PCT are discussed.

Details

Item Type Articles
CreatorsCapstick, S.and Lewis, A.
DOI10.3763/cpol.2009.0034
Uncontrolled Keywordsenergy demand, households, energy consumption, personal carbon trading, behaviour, personal responsibility
DepartmentsFaculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Psychology
RefereedYes
StatusPublished
ID Code19406

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item