Comparing physical, automatic and manual map rotation for pedestrian navigation
Reference:
Seager, W. and Stanton Fraser, D., 2007. Comparing physical, automatic and manual map rotation for pedestrian navigation. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2007-04-28 - 2007-05-03, San Jose, California.
Related documents:
This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below.
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240742
Abstract
It is well-established finding that people find maps easier to use when they are aligned so that "up" on the map corresponds to the user's forward direction. With map-based applications on handheld mobile devices, this forward/up correspondence can be maintained in several ways: the device can be physically rotated within the user's hands or the user can manually operate buttons to digitally rotate the map; alternatively, the map can be rotated automatically using data from an electronic compass. This paper examines all three options. In a field experiment, each method is compared against a baseline north-up condition. The study provides strong evidence that physical rotation is the most effective with applications that present the user with a wider map. The paper concludes with some suggestions for design improvements.
Details
| Item Type | Conference or Workshop Items (Paper) |
| Creators | Seager, W.and Stanton Fraser, D. |
| DOI | 10.1145/1240624.1240742 |
| Departments | Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Psychology |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Status | Published |
| ID Code | 20334 |
| Additional Information | Session: Mobile Interaction Techniques. ISBN:978-1-59593-593-9. |
Export
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
