Research

A Different Rationale for Redistribution: A Reply to Bjornskov


Reference:

Cullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P., 2011. A Different Rationale for Redistribution: A Reply to Bjornskov. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2), pp. 349-351.

Related documents:

This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)

Official URL:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9189-7

Abstract

First we would like to thank Christian Bjornskov for his comments and in particular for acknowledging the contribution we make in introducing the idea that inter-country redistribution might be more effective a way of redistributing incomes than interpersonal redistribution within a country and, in general, the quality of our theoretical and indeed empirical analysis. We feel that the more critical points he makes of the paper are largely due to a misunderstanding and we welcome the opportunity to further clarify our contribution.

Details

Item Type Articles
CreatorsCullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P.
DOI10.1007/s10902-010-9189-7
DepartmentsFaculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Economics
RefereedNo
StatusPublished
ID Code23486
Additional InformationReply to response to: Cullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P., 2011. A Different Rationale for Redistribution: Pursuit of Happiness in the European Union. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2), pp. 323-341. See: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/23617/

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item