A Different Rationale for Redistribution: A Reply to Bjornskov
Related documents:This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)
First we would like to thank Christian Bjornskov for his comments and in particular for acknowledging the contribution we make in introducing the idea that inter-country redistribution might be more effective a way of redistributing incomes than interpersonal redistribution within a country and, in general, the quality of our theoretical and indeed empirical analysis. We feel that the more critical points he makes of the paper are largely due to a misunderstanding and we welcome the opportunity to further clarify our contribution.
|Creators||Cullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P.|
|Departments||Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Economics|
|Additional Information||Reply to response to: Cullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P., 2011. A Different Rationale for Redistribution: Pursuit of Happiness in the European Union. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2), pp. 323-341. See: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/23617/|
Actions (login required)