A Different Rationale for Redistribution: A Reply to Bjornskov
Reference:
Cullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P., 2011. A Different Rationale for Redistribution: A Reply to Bjornskov. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2), pp. 349-351.
Related documents:
This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9189-7
Abstract
First we would like to thank Christian Bjornskov for his comments and in particular for acknowledging the contribution we make in introducing the idea that inter-country redistribution might be more effective a way of redistributing incomes than interpersonal redistribution within a country and, in general, the quality of our theoretical and indeed empirical analysis. We feel that the more critical points he makes of the paper are largely due to a misunderstanding and we welcome the opportunity to further clarify our contribution.
Details
| Item Type | Articles |
| Creators | Cullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10902-010-9189-7 |
| Departments | Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Economics |
| Refereed | No |
| Status | Published |
| ID Code | 23486 |
| Additional Information | Reply to response to: Cullis, J., Hudson, J. and Jones, P., 2011. A Different Rationale for Redistribution: Pursuit of Happiness in the European Union. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12 (2), pp. 323-341. See: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/23617/ |
Export
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
