Research

Projecting authenticity through advertising: consumer judgments of advertisers' claims


Reference:

Beverland, M. B., Lindgreen, A. and Vink, M. W., 2008. Projecting authenticity through advertising: consumer judgments of advertisers' claims. Journal of Advertising, 37 (1), pp. 5-15.

Related documents:

This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)

Official URL:

http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370101

Abstract

Authenticity is a cornerstone of contemporary marketing. Yet how do firms develop brand positions based on authenticity when marketing, and in particular, advertising, is believed to be antithetical to such positioning? We examine how consumers assess the claims of Trappist and Abbey beer brands. We identify three forms of authenticity: pure (literal) authenticity, approximate authenticity, and moral authenticity. In each case, consumers draw on either indexical or iconic cues to form judgments of authenticity, although the type of cue and degree of abstraction differ across the three types. We also find that the informants are duped by careful advertisements, and explain this by proposing that the relationships between indexical and iconic cues are closer than previously thought.

Details

Item Type Articles
CreatorsBeverland, M. B., Lindgreen, A. and Vink, M. W.
DOI10.2753/JOA0091-3367370101
DepartmentsSchool of Management
RefereedYes
StatusPublished
ID Code25453

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item