Research

Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging


Reference:

Payne, S. J., Duggan, G. B. and Neth, H., 2007. Discretionary task interleaving: heuristics for time allocation in cognitive foraging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136 (3), pp. 370-388.

Related documents:

[img]
Preview
PDF (Payne,_Duggan_&_Neth,_07.pdf) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (527kB) | Preview

    Official URL:

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.370

    Abstract

    When participants allocated time across 2 tasks (in which they generated as many words as possible from a fixed set of letters), they made frequent switches. This allowed them to allocate more time to the more productive task (i.e., the set of letters from which more words could be generated) even though times between the last word and the switch decision ("giving-up times") were higher in the less productive task. These findings were reliable across 2 experiments using Scrabble tasks and 1 experiment using word-search puzzles. Switch decisions appeared relatively unaffected by the ease of the competing task or by explicit information about tasks' potential gain. The authors propose that switch decisions reflected a dual orientation to the experimental tasks. First, there was a sensitivity to continuous rate of return--an information-foraging orientation that produced a tendency to switch in keeping with R. F. Green's (1984) rule and a tendency to stay longer in more rewarding tasks. Second, there was a tendency to switch tasks after subgoal completion. A model combining these tendencies predicted all the reliable effects in the experimental data

    Details

    Item Type Articles
    CreatorsPayne, S. J., Duggan, G. B. and Neth, H.
    DOI10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.370
    DepartmentsFaculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Health
    Faculty of Science > Computer Science
    Publisher StatementPayne,_Duggan_&_Neth,_07.pdf: Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
    RefereedYes
    StatusPublished
    ID Code27035

    Export

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads

    More statistics for this item...