Voluntary drinking behaviour, fluid balance and psychological affect when ingesting water or a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution during exercise
Reference:
Peacock, O. J., Thompson, D. and Stokes, K. A., 2012. Voluntary drinking behaviour, fluid balance and psychological affect when ingesting water or a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution during exercise. Appetite, 58 (1), pp. 56-63.
Related documents:
| PDF (Stokes_Appetite_2012_58_1_56.pdf) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (309kB) | Preview |
Official URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.023
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of drink composition on voluntary intake, hydration status, selected physiological responses and affective states during simulated gymnasium-based exercise. In a randomised counterbalanced design, 12 physically active adults performed three 20-min intervals of cardiovascular exercise at 75% heart rate maximum, one 20-min period of resistance exercise and 20 min of recovery with ad libitum access to water (W), a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES) or with no access to fluids (NF). Fluid intake was greater with CES than W (1706 ± 157 vs. 1171 ± 152 mL; P < 0.01) and more adequate hydration was achieved in CES trials (NF vs. W vs. CES: −1668 ± 73 vs. −700 ± 99 vs. −273 ± 78 g; P < 0.01). Plasma glucose concentrations were highest with CES (CES vs. NF vs. W: 4.26 ± 0.12 vs. 4.06 ± 0.08 vs. 3.97 ± 0.10 mmol/L; P < 0.05). Pleasure ratings were better maintained with ad libitum intake of CES (CES vs. NF vs. W: 2.72 ± 0.23 vs. 1.09 ± 0.20 vs. 1.74 ± 0.33; P < 0.01). Under conditions of voluntary drinking, CES resulted in more adequate hydration and a better maintenance of affective states than W or NF during gymnasium-based exercise.
Details
| Item Type | Articles |
| Creators | Peacock, O. J., Thompson, D. and Stokes, K. A. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.023 |
| Departments | Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Health |
| Publisher Statement | Stokes_Appetite_2012_58_1_56.pdf: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Appetite. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Appetite, [58, 1, (2012)] DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.023; Stokes_Appetite_2012_58_1_56.doc: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Appetite. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Appetite, [58, 1, (2012)] DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.023 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Status | Published |
| ID Code | 27597 |
Export
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
