Research

Socially responsible supply chains : Power asymmetries and joint dependence


Reference:

Hoejmose, S., Grosvold, J. and Millington, A., 2013. Socially responsible supply chains : Power asymmetries and joint dependence. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18 (3), pp. 277-291.

Related documents:

This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)

Related URLs:

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the role of relational power/dependent asymmetries and symmetries in shaping socially responsible supply chain management, whilst also examining how these issues are moderated by geographical distance between buyer and supplier. Design/methodology/approach: The study draws on data from 339 buyer-supplier relationships, and we use a set of hierarchical regression models to test our hypotheses. Findings: Joint dependency positively influences socially responsible supply chain management, whilst supplier power constrains it. Both joint dependency and buyer power becomes increasingly important determinants of socially responsible supply chain management as geographic distance increases. Research limitations/implications: Further work is needed to examine the conditions under which organisations will exercise their power advantage or their joint dependence position to improve socially responsible processes in the supply chain, as there may be situations where buyer chooses not to exercise their power positions. Practical implications: Our results indicate that jointly dependent relationships create the best conditions for socially responsible supply chain management, but we also find that supplier power advantage can constrain such initiatives. Originality/value: This is the first paper to systematically analyse the implementation of socially responsible supply chain management, within a model that considers power a/symmetric positions of the buyer-supplier relationship, and the role of geographical distance as a moderating influence on these power positions.

Details

Item Type Articles
CreatorsHoejmose, S., Grosvold, J. and Millington, A.
DOI10.1108/SCM-01-2012-0033
Related URLs
URLURL Type
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2012-0033Free Full-text
DepartmentsSchool of Management
Research CentresCentre for Business, Organisations and Society (CBOS)
RefereedYes
StatusPublished
ID Code31804

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item