The effect of threat on attentional interruption by pain


Moore, D. J., Keogh, E. and Eccleston, C., 2013. The effect of threat on attentional interruption by pain. Pain, 154 (1), pp. 82-88.

Related documents:

PDF (Author's accepted version) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1652kB) | Preview

    Official URL:

    Related URLs:


    Pain is known to interrupt attention. This interruption is highly sensitive to the extent of involvement of both attentional control and the level of threat associated with the sensation. However, few studies have examined these factors together. This study aimed to examine the interruptive effect of pain on higher-order attentional tasks under conditions of low and high threat. Fifty participants completed an n-back task, an attentional switching task, and a divided attention task, once in pain and once without pain. Twenty-five participants were given standard task instructions (control condition), and the remainder were given additional verbal information designed to increase threat (threat condition). Pain interrupted participant performance on both the n-back and attentional switching task, but not on the divided attention task. The addition of the threat manipulation did not seem to significantly alter the effect of pain on these attentional tasks. However, independent of pain, threat did moderate performance on the divided attention task. These findings support the robustness of the effect of pain on performance on higher-order attention tasks. Future research is needed to examine what factors alter the cognitive interruption caused by pain.


    Item Type Articles
    CreatorsMoore, D. J., Keogh, E. and Eccleston, C.
    Related URLs
    URLURL Type
    DepartmentsFaculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Health
    Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Psychology
    Research CentresCentre for Pain Research
    Publisher StatementEccleston_Pain_2013_154_1.pdf: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Pain. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Pain, vol 154, issue 1, 2013, DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2012.09.009
    ID Code31967


    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads

    More statistics for this item...