Nonrandom distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei clones in relation to geographical location and virulence
Vesaratchavest, M., Tumapa, S., Day, N. P. J., Wuthiekanun, V., Chierakul, W., Holden, M. T. G., White, N. J., Currie, B. J., Spratt, B. G., Feil, E. J. and Peacock, S. J., 2006. Nonrandom distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei clones in relation to geographical location and virulence. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 44 (7), pp. 2553-2557.
Related documents:This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below.
Burkholderia pseudomallei is a soil-dwelling saprophyte and the causative agent of melioidosis, a life-threatening human infection. Most cases are reported from northeast Thailand and northern Australia. Using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), we have compared (i) soil and invasive isolates front northeast Thailand and (ii) invasive isolates front Thailand and Australia. A total of 266 Thai B. pseudomallei isolates were characterized (83 soil and 183 invasive). These corresponded to 123 sequence types (STs), the most abundant being ST70 (n = 21), ST167 (n = 15), ST54 (n = 12). and ST58 (n = 11). Two clusters of related STs (clonal complexes) were identified; the larger clonal complex (CC48) did not conform to a simple pattern of radial expansion from an assumed ancestor, while a second (CC70) corresponded to a simple radial expansion from ST70. Despite the large number of STs, overall nucleotide diversity was low. Of the Thai isolates, those isolated front patients with melioidosis were overrepresented in the 10 largest clones (P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference in the classification index between environmental and disease isolates (P < 0.001), confirming that genotypes were not distributed randomly between the two samples. MLST profiles for 158 isolates from Australia (mainly disease associated) contained a number of STs (96) similar to that seen with the Thai invasive isolates, but no ST was found in both populations. There were also differences in diversity and allele frequency distribution between the two populations. This analysis reveals strong, genetic differentiation on the basis of geographical isolation and a significant differentiation on the basis of virulence potential.
|Creators||Vesaratchavest, M., Tumapa, S., Day, N. P. J., Wuthiekanun, V., Chierakul, W., Holden, M. T. G., White, N. J., Currie, B. J., Spratt, B. G., Feil, E. J. and Peacock, S. J.|
|Departments||Faculty of Science > Biology & Biochemistry|
|Additional Information||ID number: ISI:000239157400037|
Actions (login required)