Research

Elemental sulphur as an induced antifungal substance in plant defence


Reference:

Cooper, R. M. and Williams, J. S., 2004. Elemental sulphur as an induced antifungal substance in plant defence. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55 (404), pp. 1947-1953.

Related documents:

This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below.

Official URL:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh179

Abstract

Man's oldest fungicide has probably long functioned in this role in plants, as a natural component of induced antifungal defence. Elemental sulphur (S0) is the only inorganic phytoalexin and the only phytoalexin produced by so many different taxa. S0 (detected by GC-MS as 32S8) is produced in representative species of Sterculiaceae (cocoa), Solanaceae (tomato, tobacco), Malvaceae (cotton), and Leguminosae (French bean) in response to xylem-invading fungal and bacterial pathogens. Production was more rapid and intensive in disease-resistant genotypes. Gene expression for S0 production may be xylem-specific as S0 was not present in leaves of six species undergoing hypersensitivity to Pseudomonas syringae. Anomalously, high constitutive S0 levels occurred in leaves of Arabidopsis and Brassica oleracea. S0 was highly toxic (ED50 1–3 μg ml−1) to many fungal pathogens representing ascomycetes, basidiomycetes, and deuteromycetes, but not to an oomycete, Phytophthora, or to bacteria. Levels in cocoa and tomato xylem and Arabidopsis leaves were potentially inhibitory, but in other interactions were below theoretically toxic concentrations. However, S0 accumulation is highly localized, suggesting that the element is produced in sufficient amounts, at the right time and place to be effective. SEM-EDX revealed S in tomato and cocoa xylem walls, xylem parenchyma, and vascular gels and tyloses, all sites appropriate to counter vascular pathogenic Verticillium dahliae. Transient increases in sulphate, glutathione and cysteine occurred in tomato xylem. The sulphate may reflect the over-expression of sulphate transporters, but the thiols might be possible precursors. Analysis of differential gene expression should reveal what may be a novel biosynthetic pathway of S0 formation in eukaryotes.

Details

Item Type Articles
CreatorsCooper, R. M.and Williams, J. S.
DOI10.1093/jxb/erh179
DepartmentsFaculty of Science > Biology & Biochemistry
RefereedYes
StatusPublished
ID Code3989
Additional InformationID number: ISI:000223589400019

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item