Research

Beyond disaster framing: exploring multi-mandate INGOs’ representations of conflict


Reference:

Walton, O., 2017. Beyond disaster framing: exploring multi-mandate INGOs’ representations of conflict. Third World Quarterly

Related documents:

[img] PDF (Beyond_disaster_framing_revised_final (PDF)) - Repository staff only until 21 January 2019 - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (494kB) | Contact Author

    Official URL:

    https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350097

    Abstract

    This article examines how and why multi-mandate INGOs represent contemporary armed conflicts in particular ways. Based on empirical analysis of NGO communications and interviews with staff, it finds that these organisations typically adopt a two-track approach to representing conflicts. They use mainstream media to present consequence-oriented accounts to the general public, while utilising alternative channels to represent more nuanced depictions of conflict to more targeted audiences. These alternative forms of communication often aim to disrupt the dominant narratives of conflict produced by influential policy or media actors. Decisions about how to represent conflict are shaped by organisations’ histories, identities and funding relationships.

    Details

    Item Type Articles
    CreatorsWalton, O.
    DOI10.1080/01436597.2017.1350097
    DepartmentsFaculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Social & Policy Sciences
    Research CentresCentre for Development Studies
    Publisher StatementBeyond_disaster_framing_revised_final.pdf: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Third World Quarterly on 20th July 2017, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350097
    RefereedYes
    StatusPublished
    ID Code56182

    Export

    Actions (login required)

    View Item