Research

Impact of metacognitive acceptance on body dissatisfaction and negative affect:Engagement and efficacy


Reference:

Atkinson, M. J. and Wade, T. D., 2012. Impact of metacognitive acceptance on body dissatisfaction and negative affect:Engagement and efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80 (3), pp. 416-425.

Related documents:

This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below. (Contact Author)

Official URL:

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028263

Related URLs:

Abstract

Objective: To investigate engagement in metacognitive acceptance and subsequent efficacy with respect to decreasing 2 risk factors for disordered eating, body dissatisfaction (BD), and negative affect (NA). Method: In a pilot experiment, 20 female undergraduates (Mage = 24.35, SD = 9.79) underwent a BD induction procedure, received acceptance training using brief written instructions, and were then assessed on engagement in the technique. In a second experiment in which acceptance training was enhanced through the use of video format and a guided experiential exercise, 80 female undergraduates (mean age = 23.59, SD = 8.98) were randomized to an acceptance or control group following the same BD induction. Outcome measures were taken at baseline, postinduction, and posttreatment and consisted of separate visual analogue scales for weight and appearance satisfaction and the NA subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Baseline assessments included the Eating Disorder Inventory-BD, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, and the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Results: Enhanced training significantly increased engagement in acceptance. Nonengagement was associated with NA, emotion regulation difficulties, and avoidant coping. Acceptance training significantly increased weight and appearance satisfaction and reduced NA relative to control, with no significant differences between those who did and did not engage. Intervention effects were moderated by mindfulness, emotion regulation difficulty, and avoidant coping. Conclusions: Findings provide clarification regarding engagement and lend further support for the utility of acceptance, with particular benefit identified for those "at risk" for emotion regulation difficulty. © 2012 American Psychological Association.

Details

Item Type Articles
CreatorsAtkinson, M. J.and Wade, T. D.
DOI10.1037/a0028263
Related URLs
URLURL Type
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867094292&partnerID=8YFLogxKUNSPECIFIED
Uncontrolled Keywordsacceptance,body dissatisfaction,engagement,negative affect,psychiatry and mental health,clinical psychology,arts and humanities (miscellaneous)
DepartmentsFaculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Psychology
RefereedYes
StatusPublished
ID Code56930

Export

Actions (login required)

View Item