Research

A comparison of time-motion analysis methods for field-based sports.


Reference:

Roberts, S., Trewartha, G. and Stokes, K., 2006. A comparison of time-motion analysis methods for field-based sports. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 1, pp. 386-397.

Related documents:

[img]
Preview
PDF (Time motion validity_Roberts_IJSPP_2006_PURE) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (169kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Purpose. To assess the validity of a digitising time-motion analysis method for field-based sports and compare this to a notational analysis method using rugby union match play. Method. Five calibrated video cameras were located around a rugby pitch and one subject completed prescribed movements within each camera view. Running speeds were measured using photocell timing gates. Two experienced operators digitised video data (operator 1 on two occasions) to allow 2D reconstruction of the prescribed movements. Results. Accuracy for total distance calculated was within 2.1% of the measured distance. For intra- and inter-operator reliability, calculated distances were within 0.5% and 0.9% respectively. Calculated speed was within 8.0% of measured photocell speed with intra- and inter-operator reliability of 3.4% and 6.0%, respectively. For the method comparison, two 20 min periods of rugby match play were analysed for five players using the digitising method and a notational time-motion method. For the 20 min periods, overall mean absolute differences between methods for percentage time spent and distances covered performing different activities were 3.5% and 198.1 ± 138.1 m, respectively. Total number of changes in activity per 20 min were 184 ± 24 vs 458 ± 48 and work-to-rest ratio’s 10.0 / 90.0% and 7.3 / 92.7% for notational and digitising methods, respectively. Conclusion. The digitising method is accurate and reliable for gaining detailed information on work profiles of field sport participants and provides the applied researcher with richer data output than the conventional notational method.

    Details

    Item Type Articles
    CreatorsRoberts, S., Trewartha, G. and Stokes, K.
    Uncontrolled Keywordsaccuracy,notational,digitising,rugby union,reliability
    DepartmentsFaculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Health
    RefereedYes
    StatusPublished
    ID Code6391

    Export

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Document Downloads

    More statistics for this item...