How Substitutable Is Natural Capital?
Markandya, A. and Pedroso-Galinato, S., 2007. How Substitutable Is Natural Capital? Environmental and Resource Economics, 37 (1), pp. 297-312.
Related documents:This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below.
One of the recurring themes in the sustainability literature has been the extent to which a loss of natural capital can be made up for in welfare terms by an increase in other forms of capital. This issue was raised early on in the debate on sustainability by Pearce and has never really been resolved. This paper is an empirical attempt to measure the degree of substitutability between different forms of capital. A nested CES production function is used to allow flexibility in the estimated elasticities of substitution. Also, within this specification, natural resources and other inputs are combined in different levels of the function, thus allowing for different levels of substitutability. Institutional and economic indicators are also incorporated in the production function estimated. Results show that the elasticities derived from functions involving land resources were generally around one or greater, implying a fairly high degree of substitutability. Furthermore, changes in trade openness and private sector investment have a statistically significant and direct relationship on the efficiency of production and hence on income generation. No statistically significant relationship between income and any of the institutional indicators was found.
|Creators||Markandya, A.and Pedroso-Galinato, S.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords||capacity (e220), population growth (q560), environment and development, environment and trade, capital, environmental equity, investment, environmental accounting, sustainability|
|Departments||Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Social & Policy Sciences|
Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Economics
Actions (login required)