Activism, separation of powers and development
Mishra, A. and Anant, T. C. A., 2006. Activism, separation of powers and development. Journal of Development Economics, 81 (2), pp. 457-477.
Related documents:This repository does not currently have the full-text of this item.
You may be able to access a copy if URLs are provided below.
We consider a model of constitutional (mechanism) design with separation of powers where different institutions are assigned different tasks. In this context, we define activism as an institution extending its mechanism of decision making into the domain of other institution's tasks. When members of the institutions are likely to be benevolent as well as non-benevolent, such activism in a limited form reduces the cost of achieving collusion-proofness and raises welfare. Hence, the value of such activism can be potentially very high in the context of developing economies. But as the fraction of non-benevolent member increases, such activism turns excessive and reduces welfare. It is argued that developing economies are likely to get caught in the excessive activism trap because of the high levels of corruption and bribery.
|Creators||Mishra, A.and Anant, T. C. A.|
|Departments||Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Social & Policy Sciences|
Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences > Economics
Actions (login required)